1. This incident
illustrates some of the potential problems for small software developers
working with giant software manufacturers to extend or enhance their
products. Provide two good reasons why small developers should still consider
working closely with large software firms.
The two good reasons
why small developers should still consider working closely with large software
firm are so that they could use the connections of the large software firm and
for the business will still last to the industry for more times. These reasons
might useful for small firms software developers to know as they are included
to the huge firms as people might seen and it includes as an advertise to the
users being part of a well known large firms and will definitely grow also
being a large firm company.
2. What measures
could LimitNone have taken to better protect itself from Google’s alleged
actions? What measures could Google have taken to protect itself from this
lawsuit?
As for limitNone must
be more careful and have their strategies for their protection regards to the
information that they will give from Google’s alleged actions, as well same as
Google must protect itself and being also in business with LimitNone to avoid
from this lawsuit.
3. Do research
on the Web to find out how this case is proceeding in the courts. Write a short
summary of your findings.
(state law claims preempted where defendant allegedly fraudulently induced
plaintiff(LimitNone LLC) to submit proposed marketing designs, and then copied the designs and published them
as its own; “That defendants(Google INC) interfered with this right though the use of fraud and deceit by
inducing plaintiffs(LimitNone LLC)
claims sufficiently to escape Copyright Act preemption)
Most of the businesses
like this are all in common thing they give and provide information to their
millions of users in the world and do business in different company world wide
as an example of a large company like Google in today they are the most demand
to the users, and as a large company like Google they can easily handle case situation.
2. Waste Management
Sues SAP for Alleged Fraud and Breach of Contract
1. What actions
should WMI have taken to lessen the risk of this project and avoid these
problems?
To avoid these problems, Waste Management,
Inc. (WMI) together with SAP should have their understanding bot each other and the both parties must have their agreement regards to the problems so that there were be no conflict issues and encountered problems at all both sides.
2. What sort of
losses has WMI incurred from the delay of this project? How has the lack of
success on this project affected SAP?
Aside
from losing their customers, they will also lose their sales and profit, that may cause to lose their jobs and business
3. Do research on the
Web to find out the current status of the lawsuits between WMI and SAP. Write a
brief report summarizing your findings.
Waste Management’s
lawsuit against SAP for a “complete failure” of a $100 million software
implementation boils down to promises. What did SAP promise Waste Management?
And how much responsibility does Waste Management bear for believing those
promises?
According to Waste Management’s complaint, SAP said it could
offer an out-of-the-box ERP system with no customization. Waste Management’s
reality was different. That disconnect isn’t all that noteworthy. Enterprise
software companies typically say there is no customization required and
customers still need to tweak. What’s interesting is that Waste Management is
going after SAP in a very public manner. I’m familiar with Waste Management
from a previous case study on the company. In a nutshell, it’s a giant company
that has been built via acquisition. Legacy systems were everywhere and a good
chunk of them were outdated. From 2003 to 2005, Waste Management was becoming
more than an army of small waste hauling firms and an integrated company. In
2005, Waste Management was looking to overhaul its order-to-cash
process–billing, collections, pricing and customer set-up.
Source: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/promises-promises-a-look-at-waste-managements-case-against-sap/8338
3. When Certification
Is Justified
1.
How can organizations and vendors change their certifications programs to test
for skills as well as core knowledge? What issues might this introduce?
Most
organization and vendors change their certifications programs as a hiring gate
for those levels of position that is applicable for that program and for the
jobs that is required important core knowledge.
2. What are the
primary arguments against certification, and how can certifying bodies change
their programs to overcome these shortcomings?
In
the level of certification or other term for examination procedures this part
of level must be primary arguments in terms of being in the industry of
Information technology professions certifying bodies that indeed of change engages
the needs for certifying in this part of professions.
3. What are the
benefits of certification? How might certification programs need to change in
the future to better serve the needs of the IT community?
This
benefits of certification provides each standard level of being highly promoted
or on the proposal of being publicity to achieve within the level of every
organizations including individuals who already in members of the propose team
and to the consumers within the cycle of
the IT community.
No comments:
Post a Comment